ddk_mod (
ddk_mod) wrote in
daredevilkink2015-06-03 01:18 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
COMMUNITY VOTE - Reposting Prompts
How do you feel about prompts being reposted? Should it be banned entirely, or only allowed after a certain number of rounds have passed, or something else? Similar prompts will always be allowed, because it would be ridiculous to try to ban those, but prompts that are copied word for word from previous rounds are up for debate.
We do have most of the prompts from post #1 and about half of post #2 up on the Delicious account, so old prompts don't just disappear into the ether.
Mod will have the final say, but I'm all about the path of least resistance.
ETA: Okay! So, tentative new rules:
We'll have a week long prompt freeze/fill fest once prompt post #3 is finished. If that goes well, we'll have one at the end of every round.
Reposting prompts will only be allowed after one round has passed - i.e., prompts from post #2 won't be allowed to be reposted until post #4, and can only be reposted once per post. You must provide a link to where it's been previously posted (mainly because it makes it a lot easier for us managing the delicious account, but also because previous discussion on a prompt can be very inspiring).
If a prompt has been filled, you can't repost it. Prompt something else.
We do have most of the prompts from post #1 and about half of post #2 up on the Delicious account, so old prompts don't just disappear into the ether.
Mod will have the final say, but I'm all about the path of least resistance.
ETA: Okay! So, tentative new rules:
We'll have a week long prompt freeze/fill fest once prompt post #3 is finished. If that goes well, we'll have one at the end of every round.
Reposting prompts will only be allowed after one round has passed - i.e., prompts from post #2 won't be allowed to be reposted until post #4, and can only be reposted once per post. You must provide a link to where it's been previously posted (mainly because it makes it a lot easier for us managing the delicious account, but also because previous discussion on a prompt can be very inspiring).
If a prompt has been filled, you can't repost it. Prompt something else.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)I think there should be a limit. maybe that you can only post it so many times or that you have to wait [x] amount of rounds before reposting it. (Whichever is easiest to implement)
And that you need to link back to the original posting of your prompt when you reprompt.
Thats what I think anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)I think it would be ashamed to not allow it altogether bc I reckon a lot of promising prompts would get lost that way, but that's just me :3
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)I forgot about the 'golden oldies' concept! I think that was the merlin kink meme?
A couple of kink memes (particularly the ones that have high traffic) have 'fill fests' where they close down prompting for a period of time and the community focuses on filling old prompts.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 16:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 22:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)I have no problem with unfilled prompts being prompted again, even word for word. It is true that they're all safely saved in the (absolutely lovely) delicious account but I guess it's a way to have those prompts in the "same" place so to speak and to make sure that new comers do see them if they choose so? I don't know if there have been such a high number of reprompts that it's becoming a "problem" but I must admit it doen't bother me at all (yes, it's all about me, sorry lol).
Anyway, those are my two cents :)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)Also, just a suggestion, maybe we can have a fill-a-thon before the next round encouraging people to fill prompts from previous rounds before they can post new ones?
That might elevate some of the re-prompting and also give those of us who are still trying to fill prompts from round one some time to catch-up.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 16:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 16:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)People should have to wait at least a few rounds before posting it again. Considering our rounds aren't even that long, it's not asking that much.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)And encourage anyone resubmitting a prompt not to do work-for-word and to link back.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)I'm sorry to be so blunt, but honestly if people were interested in filling the prompt it would have been filled already. And I think reposting a prompt over and over again ends up having the opposite effect the poster intended; people avoid the post.
We all love our posts and want them to be filled, but it seems like certain people feel their posts deserve more attention? That's how it feels to me when I keep seeing the same post being circulated over and over again, IMO.
I like the suggestion that some other people have made, that maybe after this round finishes we could have a place to re-promote prompts from the 1st round.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-05 11:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)As for the frequency of reposting prompts, I'd definitely say that reposting in the same prompt post is too much, but the ideal length of the wait between initial posting an reposting depends on how active the kinkmeme is. At this point we're moving so fast that it's probably polite to skip at least one full prompt post before reposting any specific prompt, but if the meme slows down in the future that might change.
And yeah, it's definitely good to link back to the original posting when you repost a prompt.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not sure which would be better out of those options though...I guess if there's a set number of fills it might have an effect on the quality? Like ppl rushing to fill stuff just so the next round can start kind of thing...just a thought, I don't really know tho?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 22:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 22:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 11:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 04:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)And links to the original post. That would be so helpful.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 02:37 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 02:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 03:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 14:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 12:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 02:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 09:44 am (UTC)(link)Though I like the 'golden oldies' round concept someone mentioned above.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 10:25 am (UTC)(link)I also love the idea of fill-fests, and a week sounds like a good time limit to me. Four weeks of prompts, one week of fills, then back to four weeks of prompts? Something like that, anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 11:45 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 13:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-04 01:11 pm (UTC)(link)