ddk_mod (
ddk_mod) wrote in
daredevilkink2016-03-16 07:14 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Discussion/Off-Topic Post #2
For things that are neither prompts nor questions for the mod. Talk about the show, ask for help finding lost prompts, organise fic fests or whatever else you want. Discuss away!
Anon commenting is not mandatory for this post. Playing nice is always mandatory.
For the sake of managing spoilers, please use the Defenders-only discussion post for anything Defenders-related. Thank you!
Re: Foggy's position post-s2
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 08:45 am (UTC)(link)I love Foggy and he deserves everything. But offering a name partnership to someone based mainly on their opening statement in a case that was a major failure is... not exactly reasonable.
Re: Foggy's position post-s2
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 10:02 am (UTC)(link)This is most likely being used by the writers as a shortcut/easy way to set him up for appearing in one of the other shows or future seasons of Daredevil as the defense attorney who deals with vigilantes in NY.
Re: Foggy's position post-s2
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 11:07 am (UTC)(link)He still could end up being THE defence attorney without the shortcut. If he ends up dealing with vigilantism-related cases he'd become THE lawyer, regardless of his status as name partner/junior partner.
Just, please, writers. I need this to make sense.