I think "crack ships" are supposed to be so out there that they are not only not supported by canon, you'd have to be high on crack to think of them. For instance, if Laurie had married Jo, it would be non-canonical but not necessarily cracky. If Laurie had married Hannah Mullet, that would probably be cracky.
Note that a.) pairings we might consider crack do occur and are happy together in real life, and b.) the challenge in crack pairings is usually making us consider something originally deserving a spit-take as actually belonging in category a.
b.) the challenge in crack pairings is usually making us reconsider something we originally thought deserved a spit-take as actually belonging in category a.).
Re: Foggy/Frank ??
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)Note that a.) pairings we might consider crack do occur and are happy together in real life, and b.) the challenge in crack pairings is usually making us consider something originally deserving a spit-take as actually belonging in category a.
Re: Foggy/Frank ??
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)b.) the challenge in crack pairings is usually making us reconsider something we originally thought deserved a spit-take as actually belonging in category a.).