Thought this article might be useful to anyone writing about Matt using heart rate for lying- it's not admissible in court, for a start! http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/detection-deception-are-polygraphs-scientifically-accurate
Tbh I think that most people already know that is true but because the show and comics handwave it we also choose to handwave it. Also I think Matt has the ability to sense it in people in other ways - heartbeat is shorthand (and it's one I will use to just keep the plot moving) but judging by what he told Foggy he uses other senses along with heartbeat to detect if people are lying.
my fave mental-image is matt beeping like a polygraph whenever foggy is lying. whether this is funnier pre-reveal or post-reveal, i can't decide. (also the idea of matt doing his best "matt has detected that that is a lie" jerry springer impersonation when foggy is lying kills me)
OP: Oh absolutely, I agree. Thought it was definitely an interesting read though, in terms of ways you can get round it. It ties in nicely to some of the Matt/Foggy fic I've read where he doesn't realise Foggy is in love with him because loving Matt is his resting state :)
Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 07:57 am (UTC)(link)Thought this article might be useful to anyone writing about Matt using heart rate for lying- it's not admissible in court, for a start!
http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/detection-deception-are-polygraphs-scientifically-accurate
Enjoy :)
Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 08:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 09:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 05:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-08 07:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-15 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Polygraphs often don't work
(Anonymous) 2015-11-15 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)